Federal Lawsuit Help - Obamacare Unconstitutional-Violates First Amendment & Previous Supreme Court Decision

I need help with a Federal Lawsuit I filed challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare on filed on 12/31/2013. I could find no lawyer to assist or represent me. I created the lawsuit based on Sissel v United States. It is filed in Washington DC district court. I need help with motions, verification of my filed suit, changes I want to make and other advice. Must have access to gov legal filing system and be a lawyer in good standing within the United States Main Points of the case it violates Religious freedom, empowers the IRS to CERTIFY your religion and favors one religion over another (1947 Everson v Board of Education). Prefer fixed price and/or price per hour The case No. is 1:13-cv-2066 The assigned Judge is Kollar-Kotelly Colleen Assign Date: 12/31/2013 From my filed document: It challenges the constitutionality of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Act) as amended, both on its face and as applied to him and his constituents. See 26 U.S.C. § 5000A (2010); Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010); Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1032 (2010) (Reconciliation Act); TRICARE Affirmation Act, Pub. L.No. 111-159, 124 Stat. 1123 (2010); Pub. L. No. 111-173, 124 Stat. 1215 (2010). The Act requires that all nonexempt citizens (applicable individual) and legal residents in the United States either obtain health insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents, or face stiff civil penalties (Individual Mandate). Plaintiff asserts that this violates the United States Constitution Religious Freedom of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and a previous Supreme Court Decision , “1947 Everson v Board of Education” by WILLFULLY providing RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS and empowering the United States Government to Certify that applicable individual is part of EXEMPT RELIGION or SECT. This exceeds Congress’s authority under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution to regulate and track a person’s religion, and allows the government to favor one religion over another religion. [login to view URL] seeks (1) a declaration that the act to “Certify that applicable individual is part of an EXEMPT RELIGION or SECT” and the Act in toto, is unconstitutional, invalid, and unenforceable; (2) a permanent prohibitory injunction enjoining the enforcement of the Act or any similar law; and (3) reasonable costs and attorney fees.